Loading, please wait...
189 judgments found.
Country:
Canada Year: 1984
Court: United Nations Human Rights Committee
Citation: Communication No. 167/1984: U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/38/D/167/1984 (1990)
Health Topics:
Controlled substances,
Diet and nutrition,
Environmental health,
Infectious diseases,
Poverty,
Sexual and reproductive health,
Water, sanitation and hygiene Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination,
Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment,
Freedom of religion,
Right to a clean environment,
Right to due process/fair trial,
Right to family life,
Rights to the benefits of culture Facts: Chief Bernard Ominayak (the “author”) was the leader and representative of the Lubicon Lake Band (the “Band”), a Cree Indian Band living in the Province of Alberta in Canada. He argued that the State party expropriated Lubicon land for commercial interest despite its recognition that the Band members had the right to continue their traditional …Read more
Tags: Alcohol,
Childbirth,
Clean water,
Cruel treatment,
Degrading treatment,
Diet,
Environmental degradation,
Food,
Indigenous groups,
Inhuman treatment,
Malnutrition,
Miscarriage,
Substance abuse,
TB,
Tuberculosis,
Waste,
Waste management
Country:
United States Year: 1980
Court: 10th Circuit Court of Appeal
Citation: 639 F.2d 559 (1980)
Health Topics:
Diet and nutrition,
Health care and health services,
Health systems and financing,
Hospitals,
Medical malpractice,
Mental health,
Prisons,
Violence,
Water, sanitation and hygiene Human Rights: Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment,
Freedom of association,
Freedom of expression,
Right of access to information,
Right to due process/fair trial,
Right to family life,
Right to food,
Right to health,
Right to privacy Facts: This case was an appeal by the State of Colorado (“Colorado”) and Colorado prison officials, challenging an order from the Colorado Federal District Court directing the State of Colorado to close the maximum security unit of the Colorado State Penitentiary at Canon City (“Old Max”). Inmate Fidel Ramos filed a complaint alleging that the conditions …Read more
Tags: Access to health care,
Access to treatment,
Assault,
Budget,
Cruel and unusual punishment,
Cruel treatment,
Emergency care,
Food,
Food safety,
Garbage,
Health care professionals,
Health care workers,
Health expenditures,
Health facilities,
Health funding,
Health spending,
Imprisonment,
Inappropriate treatment,
Incarceration,
Inhuman treatment,
Inmate,
Jail,
Mental disorder,
Mental illness,
Misdiagnosis,
Prison conditions,
Psychiatry,
Psychology,
Sewage,
Trash,
Waste,
Waste management
Country:
United Kingdom Year: 1980
Court: European Commission on Human Rights
Citation: App. No. 8416/78, 3 Eur. H.R. Rep. 408 (1980)
Health Topics:
Health care and health services,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Freedom of religion,
Right to bodily integrity,
Right to due process/fair trial,
Right to family life,
Right to health,
Right to liberty and security of person,
Right to life,
Right to privacy Facts: The applicant claimed that English law violated provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights (Convention), after he found out that his wife was pregnant and planned to have a legal abortion without his consent. Specifically, the applicant claimed that England and Wales violated the right to life and the right to liberty and security …Read more
Tags: Abortion,
Access to health care,
Access to treatment,
Childbirth,
Family planning,
Pregnancy,
Spousal consent,
Spousal notification,
Termination of pregnancy,
Therapeutic abortion
Country:
Argentina Year: 1980
Court: Supreme Court of Justice [Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Argentina]
Citation: Fallos 302:1284
Health Topics:
Child and adolescent health,
Informed consent Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity,
Right to family life,
Right to health,
Right to life Facts: The parents of the 17 years old plaintiff, Claudia Graciela Saguir y Dib, filed an authorization on behalf of their daughter for her to be able to donate her kidney to her brother, who was suffering from chronic renal terminal failure. Law 21.541, art. 13, established that a person over 18 years old could donate …Read more
Tags: Child,
Children,
Health regulation,
Informed choice,
Kidney disease,
Patient choice,
Underage
Country:
Germany Year: 1977
Court: European Commission on Human Rights
Citation: Brüggemann v. F.R.G., App. No . 6959/75, 3 Eur. H.R. Rep. 244 (1977).
Health Topics:
Health care and health services,
Health systems and financing,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination,
Freedom of association,
Freedom of religion,
Right to family life,
Right to life,
Right to privacy Facts: In 1975, the Constitutional Court of Germany struck down a law that decriminalized abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy. The applicants claimed that the resulting amendment to the German criminal code, which criminalized abortion (except under certain circumstances) in the first trimester of pregnancy violated Article 8 (right to a private life) of the European Convention on …Read more
Tags: Abortion,
Access to health care,
Access to treatment,
Childbirth,
Contraception,
Contraceptives,
Criminalization,
Family planning,
Pregnancy,
Termination of pregnancy
Country:
United States Year: 1977
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Citation: Walker v. Pierce 560 F.2d 609 (4th Cir. 1977)
Health Topics:
Health care and health services,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice,
Poverty,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination,
Right to bodily integrity,
Right to family life,
Right to health,
Right to privacy Facts: Plaintiff Virgil Walker filed suit against Defendant, Clovis H. Pierce, the attending obstetrician at Aiken County Hospital in South Carolina, seeking damages and declaratory and injunctive relief for a violation of her civil rights under the 1st, 4th, 5th 8th, 9th, 13th, and 14th amendments. Virgil Walker, an African American woman on Medicaid, went to …Read more
Tags: Access to health care,
Family planning,
Indigent,
Involuntary sterilization,
Low income,
Patient choice,
Poor,
Sterilization
Download Judgment:
Country:
Denmark Year: 1976
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Kjeldsen v. Den., App. No. 5095/71, Eur. Ct. H.R. 6 (1976).
Health Topics:
Child and adolescent health,
Health information,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Freedom of religion,
Right to education,
Right to family life,
Right to privacy Facts: Appellants were parents of children who had attended Denmark public schools until they were refused exemption from the country’s compulsory sex education lessons. The parents claimed a violation of the right to education under Article 2 of Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Convention) because the alternatives to public education included costly …Read more
Tags: Awareness,
Child development,
Children,
Freedom of information,
Health education,
Health promotion,
Minor
Country:
United States Year: 1973
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: 410 U.S. 179 (1973)
Health Topics:
Health care and health services,
Poverty,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Right to family life,
Right to health,
Right to life,
Right to privacy Facts: Mary Doe, under a pseudonym, was a married, twenty-two year old mother living in Georgia. At the time of this case, she already had three children, two in foster care and the third given up for adoption due to her inability to provide for them. She sought an abortion from the Grady Memorial Hospital Abortion …Read more
Tags: Abortion,
Abortion counseling,
Access to treatment,
Clinics,
Conscientious objection,
Family planning,
Health care professionals,
Health care workers,
Health facilities,
Low income,
Poor,
Pregnancy,
Private hospitals,
Public hospitals,
Termination of pregnancy,
Therapeutic abortion
Country:
United States Year: 1942
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: 316 U.S. 535 (1942)
Health Topics:
Informed consent,
Prisons,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination,
Right to bodily integrity,
Right to family life,
Right to liberty and security of person Facts: Petitioner brought a constitutional challenge to provisions of Oklahoma’s Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act of 1935 (the Act), which permitted sentences of compulsory sterilization for “habitual offenders” in crimes involving “moral turpitude.” Pursuant to section 195 of the Act, the same sentence did not extend to white-collar crimes, defined as those “offenses arising out of the …Read more
Tags: Compulsory treatment,
Detention,
Forced treatment,
Imprisonment,
Incarceration,
Inmate,
Involuntary treatment,
Jail,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Sterilization