Loading, please wait...
201 judgments found.
Country:
New Zealand Year: 2014
Court: High Court
Citation: [2014] NZHC 1433
Health Topics:
Informed consent,
Prisons Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity,
Right to life Facts: In this case, the Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (“Department”) and the Canterbury District Health Board (“DHB”) sought a declaration of their rights and duties when providing medical treatment to prisoners. Specifically, they wished to receive a declaration that they have a right to provide medical treatment by way of artificial hydration and …Read more
Tags: Compulsory treatment,
Forced treatment,
Informed choice,
Involuntary treatment,
Mandatory treatment,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Patient choice,
Unauthorized treatment
Country:
Bolivia Year: 2014
Court: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Citation: Report No. 72/14, Case 12.655; Merits I.V. BOLIVIA; August 15, 2014
Health Topics:
Informed consent,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination,
Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment,
Right to bodily integrity,
Right to family life,
Right to privacy Facts: I.V. went to a hospital for a cesarean section and was sterilized by her doctor. She alleged that the only questions that the doctor had asked her before the procedure were where she had her first cesarean section and whether she had previously had an infection. I.V. maintained that she was not given any information …Read more
Tags: Compulsory sterilization,
Compulsory treatment,
Forced sterilization,
Forced treatment,
Health care professionals,
Informed choice,
Involuntary sterilization,
Involuntary treatment,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Patient choice,
Pregnancy,
Sterilization,
Unauthorized treatment
Country:
Australia Year: 2014
Court: Supreme Court of Victoria
Citation: [2014] VSC 564
Health Topics:
Informed consent,
Mental health Human Rights: Right to liberty and security of person,
Right to privacy Facts: XX, a mental health patient, had been detained and treated against her will at a treatment center under an Involuntary Treatment Order (“ITO”) in August 2013. The ITO was revoked by the Mental Health Review Board (“Board”). Following XX’s return to the ward, conversations with staff and an assessment by a psychiatric nurse, WW recommended …Read more
Tags: Bipolar,
Compulsory commitment,
Compulsory confinement,
Compulsory treatment,
Forced treatment,
Involuntary commitment,
Involuntary confinement,
Involuntary treatment,
Mandatory commitment,
Mandatory confinement,
Patient choice
Country:
South Africa Year: 2014
Court: Constitutional Court of South Africa
Citation: (CCT 74/14) [2014] ZACC 34
Health Topics:
Child and adolescent health,
Disabilities,
Health care and health services,
Health information,
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Right to health Facts: The mother of the applicant, who was born in 2008 with Down Syndrome instituted a claim on his behalf for damages against the Fetal Assessment Centre. Her son was born in 2008 with Down syndrome. She claimed that the Centre negligently failed to warn her of the high risk that her child would be born …Read more
Tags: Abortion,
Awareness,
Child development,
Children,
Compensation,
Confidentiality,
Damages,
Diagnostics,
Differently abled,
Disabled,
Disclosure,
Examination,
Health care technology,
Informed choice,
Minor,
Misdiagnosis,
Negligence,
Termination of pregnancy,
Testing,
Tort
Country:
Iceland Year: 2014
Court: High Court of Ireland
Citation: [2014] IEHC 592
Health Topics:
Hospitals,
Informed consent Human Rights: Right to health,
Right to liberty and security of person Facts: This is a case about the applicant challenging an order from Mental Health Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) that demanded her involuntary admission to St. John of God’s Hospital (“the Hospital”) for treatment of a mental disorder. On April 28th, 2014, a member of An Garda Síochána detained the applicant because there were sufficient grounds to believe …Read more
Tags: Compulsory commitment,
Compulsory confinement,
Compulsory examination,
Compulsory testing,
Compulsory treatment,
Confinement,
Health facilities,
Involuntary commitment,
Involuntary examination,
Involuntary testing,
Involuntary treatment,
Mandatory examination,
Mandatory testing,
Mandatory treatment,
Mental disorder,
Mental institution,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Unauthorized treatment
Country:
United Kingdom Year: 2014
Court: The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
Citation: [2014] HRLR 17
Health Topics:
Disabilities,
Informed consent,
Mental health Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity,
Right to liberty and security of person Facts: The appellants, all individuals suffering from severe medical conditions, wished to die but were physically incapable of doing so themselves, due to their respective medical limitations. They could not find anyone to assist them in ending their lives; UK law criminalized assisting suicide. At issue was whether s. 2(1) of the Suicide Act 1961 (“s. …Read more
Tags: Criminalization,
Disabled,
Informed choice,
Patient choice,
Suicide
Country:
Latvia Year: 2014
Court: The European Court of Human Rights
Citation: ECHR 181 (2014)
Health Topics:
Health care and health services,
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice Human Rights: Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment,
Right to bodily integrity,
Right to family life,
Right to privacy Facts: The applicant’s son at the age of 23 was in a car accident and sustained very serious injuries. He had to be operated on but his condition became worse after her surgery and he died. After a few months, she discovered that her son’s kidneys and spleen had been removed for organ transplantation after his …Read more
Tags: Clinics,
Degrading treatment,
Emergency care,
Health facilities,
Inhuman treatment,
Patient choice,
Public hospitals
Country:
Australia Year: 2014
Court: Supreme Court of Victoria, Common Law Division, Judicial Review and Appeals
Citation: [2014] VSC 564
Health Topics:
Informed consent,
Mental health Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity,
Right to liberty and security of person Facts: The plaintiff, XX, suffered from bipolar effective disorder and carried a history of self-harm. On August 19, 2012, an involuntary treatment order (hereinafter “the ITO”) was made pursuant to the Mental Health Act 1986(hereinafter “the Act”) requiring her to be detained and to receive involuntary psychiatric treatment at Monash Medical Centre. The plaintiff appealed against …Read more
Country:
Namibia Year: 2014
Court: Supreme Court of Namibia
Citation: [2014] NASC 19
Health Topics:
Health care and health services,
Health information,
HIV/AIDS,
Informed consent,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity,
Right to family life Facts: The respondents, three Namibian HIV positive pregnant women, were sterilized while undergoing emergency caesareans. The respondents each signed a consent form, which included consent to the caesarean operation and sterilization through bilateral tubal ligation (BLT) but claimed that they did not provide informed consent which is required for sterilization to be considered lawful. The first …Read more
Tags: Abortion counseling,
Awareness,
Caesarean,
Compulsory sterilization,
Confidentiality,
Counseling,
Emergency care,
Family planning,
Forced sterilization,
Health care professionals,
Health care workers,
Health education,
Health records,
HIV,
HIV positive,
HIV/AIDS,
Informed choice,
Informed consent,
Involuntary sterilization,
Mandatory sterilization,
Medical records,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Patient choice,
People living with HIV/AIDS,
Sterilization,
Unauthorized treatment
Country:
Australia Year: 2013
Court: High Court
Health Topics:
Chronic and noncommunicable diseases,
Health care and health services,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity Facts: Appellant doctor Reeves, a gynecologist, saw CDW, his patient, for treatment of a pre-cancerous lesion on her left labia minora. Reeves performed a “simple vulvectomy” which entailed the removal of CDW’s entire vulva, including her labia and clitoris. CDW filed suit, and provided evidence that she had only agreed to removal of a small flap …Read more
Tags: Cancer,
Examination,
Female genital mutilation,
Health care professionals,
Health care workers,
Inappropriate treatment,
Informed choice,
Involuntary treatment,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Noncommunicable diseases,
Patient choice,
Unauthorized treatment
Country:
United Kingdom Year: 2013
Court: Court of Protection
Citation: [2013] EWHC 1417 (COP)
Health Topics:
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Medicines,
Mental health,
Sexual and reproductive health Facts: A pregnant 37-year-old woman diagnosed with bipolar disorder was compulsorily detained under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act 1983. She had been on and off medication for 8 years and had suffered both remissions and relapses, due to which she was detained at various times in Italy, France and in England where she currently …Read more
Tags: Abortion,
Bipolar,
Compulsory commitment,
Compulsory confinement,
Incapacity,
Incompetence,
Informed choice,
Insanity,
Involuntary commitment,
Involuntary confinement,
Mandatory commitment,
Mandatory confinement,
Mental competence,
Mental disorder,
Mental illness,
Mental institution,
Paranoia,
Patient choice,
Psychiatry,
Spousal consent,
Suicide,
Termination of pregnancy
Country:
Armenia Year: 2013
Court: Civil Court of Appeal [Հայաստանի Հանրապետության Վերաքննիչ քաղաքացիական դատարան]
Citation: Case № ԵԱՆԴ/0895/02/13
Health Topics:
Health care and health services,
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Mental health Human Rights: Right to due process/fair trial,
Right to liberty and security of person Facts: The appellant, Zhuleta Amarikyan, was compulsorily committed to inpatient psychiatric treatment on the request of the head of the psychiatric clinic. Amarikyan was diagnosed with acute delirium syndrome and was described as being a danger to herself and others and unable to control her actions. At the time of the trial of Amarikyan’s commitment, Amarikyan …Read more
Tags: Clinics,
Compulsory commitment,
Compulsory confinement,
Compulsory examination,
Compulsory treatment,
Diagnostics,
Forced examination,
Forced treatment,
Health care professionals,
Health care workers,
Health facilities,
Incapacity,
Incompetence,
Insanity,
Involuntary confinement,
Involuntary examination,
Involuntary treatment,
Mandatory commitment,
Mental competence,
Mental disability,
Mental disorder,
Mental illness,
Mental institution,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Patient choice,
Public hospitals
Country:
Russia Year: 2013
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Application No. 33117/02; [2013] ECHR 63
Health Topics:
Informed consent,
Mental health Human Rights: Right to family life,
Right to liberty and security of person Facts: Lashin, a Russian citizen, was diagnosed with schizophrenia, given a 2nd degree disability status, and hospitalised multiple times. A hospital examination concluded that Lashin was incapable of understanding the meaning of his actions and unable to control them. Following an application by the public prosecutor, the District Court of Omsk declared Lashin legally incapacitated at …Read more
Tags: Compulsory commitment,
Compulsory confinement,
Involuntary commitment,
Involuntary confinement Mental disorder,
Mental illness,
Mental institution Schizophrenia
Country:
Moldova Year: 2013
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Application No. 16761/09
Health Topics:
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity,
Right to family life Facts: Plaintiffs in this case were husband and wife. When G.B. was giving birth at the Stefan-Vodă regional hospital, a state-owned regional hospital, the head of the obstetrics and gynecology department preformed a Caesarean section on her and removed her ovaries and Fallopian tubes without obtaining her permission. As a result, G.B. suffered early menopause and …Read more
Tags: Caesarian,
Childbirth,
Compensation,
Compulsory sterilization,
Damages,
Forced sterilization,
Health care professionals,
Health care workers,
Health facilities,
Involuntary sterilization,
Negligence,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Non-pecuniary damages,
Pregnancy,
Public hospitals,
Remedies,
Sterilization,
Tort,
Unauthorized treatment
Country:
Russia Year: 2013
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Application No. 28796/07
Health Topics:
Informed consent,
Mental health Human Rights: Right to due process/fair trial,
Right to liberty and security of person Facts: Applicant, Petukhova, argued that she was deprived of her liberty when she was forced to have an involuntary examination. She alleged that this violated Article 5 § 1 (b) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“Convention”), which protects the right to liberty and security of person. In December 2005, …Read more
Tags: Compulsory examination,
Forced examination,
Informed consent,
Involuntary commitment,
Involuntary confinement,
Involuntary examination,
Mandatory examination,
Mental competence,
Mental disorder,
Mental health,
Mental illness,
Paranoia,
Patient choice,
Schizophrenia
Country:
Turkey Year: 2013
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Application No. 13423/09
Health Topics:
Health care and health services,
Health systems and financing,
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Right to life Facts: The first applicant’s wife and second applicant’s mother, Menekse Senturk, was 34 weeks pregnant when she began experiencing pain. The first applicant took Mrs. Senturk to the Karsiyaka Public Hospital, the Izmir Public Hospital, the Ataturk Research and Teaching Hospital, and the Ege University Medical Faculty Hospital over the course of the day. Only at …Read more
Tags: Access to health care,
Access to treatment,
Duty of care,
Emergency care,
Inadequate treatment,
Inappropriate treatment,
Maternal mortality,
Miscarriage,
Negligence,
Out-of-pocket expenditures,
Patient choice,
Pregnancy,
Private hospitals,
Standard of care
Country:
Romania Year: 2013
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Application No. 1285/03
Health Topics:
Disabilities,
Informed consent,
Mental health Human Rights: Right to family life,
Right to privacy Facts: The applicant, M.B., filed a complaint with the European Court of Human Rights for a violation of (1) laws concerning compulsory admission to psychiatric hospitals and (2) laws concerning decisions in child-rearing where the parent or guardian’s mental capacity is in question. M.B. was diagnosed in 2000 with paranoid schizophrenia. As a result of her …Read more
Tags: Compulsory commitment,
Compulsory confinement,
Compulsory examination,
Counselling,
Disabled,
Forced examination,
Handicapped,
Incapacity,
Incompetence,
Informed choice,
Involuntary commitment,
Involuntary confinement,
Involuntary examination,
Mandatory commitment,
Mandatory confinement,
Mandatory examination,
Mental competence,
Mental disability,
Mental disorder,
Mental illness,
Paranoia,
Patient choice,
Schizophrenia
Country:
Canada Year: 2013
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: 2013 SCC 30
Health Topics:
Child and adolescent health,
Chronic and noncommunicable diseases,
Disabilities,
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Right of access to information Facts: The plaintiff, who had previously given birth via caesarean section, was due to give birth a second time. Her obstetrician recommended a vaginal birth. During labor, Cojocaru’s uterus ruptured, which restricted oxygen supply to the baby. The scar from the previous caesarean contributed to the rupture, and an emergency caesarean section was performed. The baby …Read more
Tags: Caesarean,
Child development,
Childbirth,
Children,
Compensation,
Counseling,
Damages,
Differently abled,
Disabled,
Duty of care,
Emergency care,
Examination,
Handicapped,
Health care professionals,
Health care workers,
Inadequate treatment,
Infant health,
Informed choice,
Maternal health,
Minor,
Negligence,
Neurological diseases,
Noncommunicable diseases,
Parental consent,
Parental notification,
Physically challenged,
Pregnancy,
Public hospitals,
Remedies,
Standard of care,
Tort
Country:
Canada Year: 2013
Court: Supreme Court of Canada
Citation: 2013 SCC 18
Health Topics:
Child and adolescent health,
Disabilities,
Health care and health services,
Health information,
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice Human Rights: Right to health Facts: The plaintiff, Cassidy Ediger (C) suffered from persistent bradycardia (slow heartrate) during birth resulting in severe brain damage. During the delivery procedure, the doctor attempted a mid-level forceps procedure as C’s mother’s labour was not progressing. Dr. Johnston did not inform C’s mother of the risks involved in the procedure including bradycardia and hence did …Read more
Tags: Compensation,
Damages,
Differently abled,
Disclosure,
Duty of care,
Emergency care,
Health care professionals,
Infant health,
Informed consent,
Medical negligence,
Negligence,
Standard of care,
Tort
Country:
Canada Year: 2013
Court: Ontario Court of Appeal
Citation: 2013 ONCA 415
Health Topics:
Health information,
HIV/AIDS,
Infectious diseases,
Informed consent,
Sexual and reproductive health,
Violence Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity,
Right to liberty and security of person Facts: As a result of his alleged non-disclosure of his HIV-positive status to 3 complainants prior to engaging in sexual relations, the appellant (defendant), Lester Felix, was convicted of five counts of aggravated sexual assault and one count of sexual assault. Felix appealed all convictions. There was no evidence of the appellant’s level of risk of …Read more
Tags: Assault,
Condoms,
Contraception,
Contraceptives,
Disclosure,
HIV,
HIV positive,
HIV status,
Informed choice,
Non-disclosure,
People living with HIV/AIDS,
PLHIV,
Rape,
Sexual abuse,
Sexual assault,
Sexual violence,
Sexually transmitted diseases,
Sexually transmitted infections,
STDs,
STIs,
Transmission
Country:
Russia Year: 2013
Court: The European Court of Human Rights
Citation: ECHR 171 (2013)
Health Topics:
Health information,
Hospitals,
Informed consent Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination,
Freedom of religion,
Right to privacy Facts: The applicant organization is a religious organization. Another organization wrote to the Russian president accusing the applicant organization of extremism and that an inquiry must be ensued into their activities. The letter was forwarded to the Prosecutor’s office and no violation was found. However, the applicant organization was not given access to the filed concerning …Read more
Tags: Clinics,
Confidentiality,
Disclosure,
Freedom of information,
Health data,
Health records,
Medical records,
Private hospitals,
Public hospitals,
Secrecy
Country:
Romania Year: 2013
Court: The European Court of Human Rights
Citation: CASE OF CSOMA v. ROMANIA (Application no. 8759/05) 2013
Health Topics:
Health care and health services,
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity,
Right to due process/fair trial,
Right to life,
Right to privacy Facts: The applicant in this case was a nurse who was pregnant and was being followed by a gynecologist, Dr. P.C, at the hospital where she had been working. At the 16th week of her pregnancy, hydrocephalus was diagnosed with the fetus and the pregnancy was determined to be interrupted. To induce the abortion, medications and …Read more
Country:
Nigeria Year: 2012
Court: High Court of Lagos State
Citation: Suit No. ID/16272000
Health Topics:
Health care and health services,
HIV/AIDS,
Infectious diseases,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination,
Right to health Facts: The Plaintiff was a nurse at a medical centre. Defendants were the medical centre and a doctor at the centre. While employed at the medical centre, the Plaintiff became pregnant and developed a skin disorder. She sought medical attention and the Defendant doctor performed several diagnostic tests. Neither the nature nor the outcome of the tests …Read more
Tags: Access to health care,
Access to treatment,
AIDS,
Compensation,
Compulsory testing,
Damages,
Duty of care,
Employment,
HIV,
HIV positive,
HIV status,
Informed choice,
Involuntary testing,
Mandatory testing,
Maternal health,
Miscarriage,
Negligence,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Patient choice,
People living with HIV/AIDS,
PLHIV,
Pregnancy,
Sexually transmitted diseases,
Sexually transmitted infections,
Standard of care,
STDs,
STIs,
Transmission
Country:
Czech Republic Year: 2012
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Application No. 23419/07; [2012] ECHR 1960
Health Topics:
Informed consent,
Mental health Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity,
Right to due process/fair trial,
Right to liberty and security of person,
Right to privacy Facts: Milan Sykora, a Czech national, suffered from a psycho-social disability and did not take his medication because he claimed it negatively affected his eyesight. In November 2000 the Brno Municipal Court deprived Sykora of his capacity to make legal decisions after he failed to collect his pension for four years. The decision was made based …Read more
Tags: Compulsory commitment,
Compulsory examination,
Compulsory testing,
Compulsory treatment,
Forced examination,
Forced treatment,
Health care professionals,
Health care workers,
Incapacity,
Involuntary commitment,
Involuntary examination,
Involuntary testing,
Involuntary treatment,
Mandatory commitment,
Mandatory examination,
Mandatory testing,
Mandatory treatment,
Mental competence,
Mental disorder,
Mental illness,
Mental institution,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Paranoia,
Patient choice,
Psychiatry,
Psychosis,
Schizophrenia,
Unauthorized treatment
Country:
Slovakia Year: 2012
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: N.B. v Slovakia, App. No. 29518/10, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2012).
Health Topics:
Child and adolescent health,
Health care and health services,
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice,
Mental health,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination,
Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment,
Right to bodily integrity,
Right to family life Facts: Ms. N.B. was of Roma ethnic origin. She was sterilized at a public hospital, at the age of 17, during the birth of her second child. Ms. N.B. asserted that she had been coerced into signing authorizations for her sterilization, that she was segregated within the hospital due to her ethnicity and that the decision …Read more
Tags: Caesarean,
Childbirth,
Children,
Compensation,
Compulsory sterilization,
Compulsory treatment,
Cruel treatment,
Degrading treatment,
Family planning,
Forced sterilization,
Forced treatment,
Health care professionals,
Health care workers,
Humiliating treatment,
In utero fertilization,
Inappropriate treatment,
Infertility,
Informed choice,
Inhuman treatment,
Involuntary sterilization,
Involuntary treatment,
Mandatory sterilization,
Mandatory treatment,
Maternal health,
Minor,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Parental consent,
Patient choice,
Pregnancy,
Public hospitals,
Remedies,
Sterilization,
Unauthorized treatment
Country:
Slovakia Year: 2012
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: App. No. 15966/04
Health Topics:
Health care and health services,
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Medical malpractice,
Sexual and reproductive health Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination,
Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment,
Right of access to information,
Right to family life Facts: Three applicants of Roma ethnic origin were all sterilized in a public hospital during Caesarean section deliveries. The first applicant was not told that she had been sterilized. After the delivery, a doctor asked her to sign a document that all women who had Caesarean sections had to sign. Five days after the delivery she …Read more
Tags: Caesarian,
Childbirth,
Compulsory sterilization,
Family planning,
Forced sterilization,
Forced treatment,
Inappropriate treatment,
Infertility,
Informed choice,
Involuntary sterilization,
Involuntary treatment,
Mandatory sterilization,
Mandatory treatment,
Non-consensual testing and treatment,
Parental consent,
Patient choice,
Public hospitals,
Sterilization,
Unauthorized treatment
Country:
Ukraine Year: 2012
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Application No. 2452/04
Health Topics:
Hospitals,
Informed consent,
Mental health Human Rights: Right to liberty and security of person Facts: The applicant was hospitalized for mental illness four times between 1999 and 2006. The first time, the applicant received in-patient treating in a state-run hospital. In 2000, the applicant was registered as a person with potential mental problems with the Odessa Region Psychoneurological Dispensary. Three years later, the applicant was again involuntarily hospitalized. A doctor …Read more
Tags: Compulsory commitment,
Compulsory confinement,
Compulsory examination,
Compulsory treatment,
Forced examination,
Forced treatment,
Health facilities,
Inappropriate treatment,
Involuntary commitment,
Involuntary confinement,
Involuntary examination,
Involuntary treatment,
Mandatory examination,
Mandatory treatment,
Mental disorder,
Mental institution,
Patient choice,
Psychiatry,
Public hospitals,
Unauthorized treatment
Country:
Bulgaria Year: 2012
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Application Nos. 47039/11 and 358/12
Health Topics:
Chronic and noncommunicable diseases,
Health care and health services,
Informed consent,
Medicines Human Rights: Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment,
Right to life,
Right to privacy Facts: The applicants had terminal cancer, and all had either tried forms of conventional medicine (e.g. surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy) or obtained a medical opinion that these treatments would not work for their illness. They then approached a private client in Sofia where they were told about an experimental anti-cancer product in development by …Read more
Tags: Access to drugs,
Access to health care,
Access to medicines,
Access to treatment,
Alternative medicine,
Cancer,
Clinical testing,
Clinical trials,
Drug quality,
Drug safety,
Experimental treatment,
Informed choice,
Non-communicable diseases,
Patient choice,
Tertiary care