143 judgments found.

In re MB (medical treatment)

Country: United Kingdom
Year: 1997
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Citation: [1997] EWCA Civ 3093
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Informed consent, Mental health, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity, Right to health, Right to privacy
Facts:

A health authority applied for a High Court declaration that it would be lawful to undertake an emergency caesarean operation on MB whose foetus was found to be in the breech position after MB agreed to have the operation theoretically but refused in practice due to her fear of needles. The declaration was granted, and …Read more

Tags: Access to health care, Access to treatment, Caesarean, Childbirth, Emergency care, Incompetence, Informed choice, Involuntary treatment, Maternal health, Mental competence, Non-consensual testing and treatment, Patient choice, Pregnancy, Unauthorized treatment
Download Judgment: English

R v. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ex parte Blood

Country: United Kingdom
Year: 1997
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Citation: [1997] 2 All ER 687; [1997] 2 WLR 806; [1999] Fam 151
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, Informed consent, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity, Right to family life, Right to health
Facts:

Mr. and Mrs. Blood were married and attempting to have a family. Unfortunately, Mr. Blood contracted meningitis and went into a coma prior to any conception, so Mrs. Blood requested that doctors take sperm by electro-ejaculation while Mr. Blood was in the coma. The doctors took two different samples, and Mr. Blood passed away soon …Read more

Tags: Access to health care, Access to treatment, Assisted reproductive technology, Compulsory treatment, Family planning, Forced treatment, Health care technology, Health regulation, In utero fertilization, In vitro fertilization, Informed choice, Involuntary treatment, Mandatory treatment, Non-consensual testing and treatment, Patient choice, Spousal consent, Unauthorized treatment
Download Judgment: English

Vacco v. Quill

Country: United States
Year: 1997
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: 521 U.S. 793 (1997)
Health Topics: Informed consent
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Right to liberty and security of person
Facts:

Respondents, physicians operating in New York and gravelly-ill patients (who had died prior to the appeal), asserted that, though it was consistent with the standards of medical practice to “prescribe lethal medication for ‘mentally competent, terminally ill patients’ who are suffering great pain and desire a doctor’s help in taking their own lives, they [were] …Read more

Tags: Assisted suicide, Informed choice, Non-consensual testing and treatment, Patient choice, Unauthorized treatment
Download Judgment: English

Washington v. Glucksberg

Country: United States
Year: 1997
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: 521 U.S. 702 (1997)
Health Topics: Controlled substances, Health care and health services, Informed consent, Mental health
Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity, Right to liberty and security of person, Right to life, Right to privacy
Facts:

Under the Wash. Rev. Code §9A36.060 (1) it was a crime to cause or aid another person to commit suicide. In 1996, a lower court struck down this law on the basis it violated an individual’s constitutionally protected right to choose the time and manner of death. The petitioners, the State of Washington and its …Read more

Tags: Assisted suicide, Criminalization, Health care professionals, Health care workers, Informed choice, Palliative care, Patient choice, Suicide
Download Judgment: English

Breen v. Williams

Country: Australia
Year: 1996
Court: High Court
Citation: (1996) 186 CLR 71; (1996) 43 ALD 481; (1996) 138 ALR 259; (1996) 70 ALJR 772; [1996] 13 Leg Rep 11; [1996] HCA 57
Health Topics: Health information, Informed consent, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right of access to information, Right to bodily integrity, Right to property
Facts:

In 1977, Julie Breen had a bilateral augmentation mammoplasty which involved the insertion of a silicone implant in each of her breasts. She later developed a complication in the way of bilateral breast capsules. In 1978, she sought the opinion of Dr. Cholmondeley Williams, who had not performed the original procedure. Dr. Williams advised Breen …Read more

Tags: Confidentiality, Disclosure, Drug safety, Duty of care, Health information, Health records, Informed choice, Medical records, Patient choice, Standard of care, Tort
Download Judgment: English

C v. Minister of Correctional Services

Country: South Africa
Year: 1996
Court: High Court
Citation: 1996 (4) SA 292 (T)
Health Topics: Health information, HIV/AIDS, Infectious diseases, Informed consent, Prisons
Human Rights: Right of access to information, Right to privacy
Facts:

While a prisoner in custody of the defendant, the plaintiff was informed by the prison nurse in the presence of other prisoners that he was to undergo a blood test for HIV and that he had the right to refuse such test. This information was repeated to the plaintiff in a closed consulting room, but …Read more

Tags: AIDS, Compulsory testing, Confidentiality, Custody, HIV, HIV positive, HIV status, Imprisonment, Incarceration, Informed choice, Inmate, Involuntary testing, Jail, Mandatory testing, Most-at-risk, Non-consensual testing and treatment, Patient choice, People living with HIV/AIDS, PLHIV, Sexually transmitted diseases, Sexually transmitted infections, STDs, STIs, Transmission
Download Judgment: English

R v. Cambridge Health Authority, ex parte Beckwith

Country: United Kingdom
Year: 1995
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Citation: [1995] 2 All ER 129 (CA); [1995] EWCA Civ 49
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Chronic and noncommunicable diseases, Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, Hospitals, Informed consent, Medicines
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
Facts:

The child “B” had a long history of unsuccessful treatments fo her cancer. In January 1995,  B suffered a further relapse of acute myeloid leukaemia. Both the doctor who oversaw B’s treatment since the initial diagnosis and the doctor who performed a prior bone marrow transplant agreed that the child had approximately six to eight …Read more

Tags: Access to treatment, Budget, Cancer, Children, Experimental treatment, Health care professionals, Health care workers, Health expenditures, Health facilities, Health funding, Health insurance, Health spending, Leukemia, Minor, Noncommunicable diseases, Patient choice, Pediatric health, Private hospitals, Public hospitals, Second-line treatment, Subsidies, Tertiary care
Download Judgment: English

Rizzo v. Schiller

Country: United States
Year: 1994
Court: Rizzo v. Schiller 445 S.E. 2d 153 (Va. 1994)
Citation: Rizzo v. Schiller 445 S.E. 2d 153 (Va. 1994)
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Infectious diseases, Medical malpractice, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to health
Facts:

Plaintiffs, Michael Sean Rizzo Sr. and Pamela Rizzo, filed this action against defendant physician Maurice Schiller, who they alleged breached the standard of care owed to them with his negligent and nonconsensual use of obstetrical forceps during Mrs. Rizzo’s delivery. Pamela Rizzo was admitted to Fairfax Hospital on November 7th at 9:00am in active labor. …Read more

Tags: Childbirth, Duty of care, Inappropriate treatment, Infant health, Patient choice, Standard of care, Tort, Unauthorized treatment
Download Judgment:

Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland

Country: United Kingdom
Year: 1993
Court: House of Lords
Citation: [1993] 1 ALL ER 821
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Informed consent, Mental health
Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity, Right to health, Right to life, Right to privacy
Facts:

Mr. Bland was in the care of the health authority, and had been in a persistent vegetative state for three and a half years due to a severe crushed chest injury, which had caused devastating and permanent damage to the higher functions of his brain. He was being fed artificially by a tube inserted through …Read more

Tags: Access to treatment, Incompetence, Informed choice, Involuntary treatment, Mental competence, Non-consensual testing and treatment, Patient choice, Unauthorized treatment
Download Judgment: English

Department of Health & Community Services v JWB & SMB (“Marion’s Case”)

Country: Australia
Year: 1992
Court: High Court
Citation: (1992) 175 CLR 218; [1992] HCA 15
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Disabilities, Informed consent, Mental health, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Right to bodily integrity, Right to life, Right to privacy
Facts:

“Marion” was a fourteen year old girl with an “intellectual disability”, severe deafness, epilepsy, an ataxic gait and “behavioural problems”. She could not care for herself. Her parents proposed that Marion undertake a hysterectomy and an ovarienectomy (the Procedures). The hysterectomy was proposed to prevent natural pregnancy and menstruation and the psychological and behavioural consequences …Read more

Tags: Children, Contraception, Contraceptives, Deaf, Disabled, Forced sterilization, Forced treatment, Handicapped, Incompetence, Informed choice, Involuntary treatment, Mental competence, Mental disability, Mental disorder, Mental illness, Mental institution, Mental retardation, Minor, Non-consensual testing and treatment, Patient choice, Physically challenged, Pregnancy, Psychiatry, Psychology, Sterilization
Download Judgment: English