104 judgments found.

Case 42755708

Country: Latvia
Year: 2010
Court: District Court of Administrative Cases
Citation: A02405-10/18
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, Medicines
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
Facts:

The Plaintiff bought 13 packs of Sprycel, also known as desatinib, during the year and sought reimbursement for their costs. A local university hospital doctors council concluded that the Plaintiff would not survive without Sprycel treatment. According to the law of Latvia, the Plaintiff was reimbursed up to LVL 10 000 for his purchase of …Read more

Tags: Access to treatment, Budget, Essential medicines, Health expenditures, Health regulation, Health spending, Out-of-pocket expenditures, Pricing, Reimbursement
Download Judgment: English Latvian

Case 857/B/2005 AB

Country: Hungary
Year: 2010
Court: Constitutional Court
Health Topics: Aging, Health systems and financing
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to social security
Facts:

Petitioner sought a declaration that a certain provision of a government decree regulating minimum pension amounts was unconstitutional because it (a) regulated a fundamental right which could only be done by statute and (b) provided a social security benefit too low to maintain human dignity, which was guaranteed by the Constitution.

Tags: Aged persons, Budget, Elderly, Health funding, Health insurance, Health regulation, Health spending, Older persons, Out-of-pocket expenditures, Senior citizens, Social security
Download Judgment: English

Case AI 780709/RS

Country: Brazil
Year: 2010
Court: Federal Supreme Court
Citation: AI 780709/RS, Supremo Tribunal Federal [Federal Supreme Court] (2010).
Health Topics: HIV/AIDS, Infectious diseases, Medicines, Poverty
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
Facts:

The Court of Justice held the State of Rio Grande do Sul responsible for providing medicines free of charge to an individual living with HIV who was unable to afford them. The court based its decision on the rights to life and health. Considering these medications necessary for the survival of the individual, the court blocked …Read more

Tags: Access to drugs, Access to medicines, AIDS, Antiretrovirals, ARVs, Budget, Essential medicines, Health spending, HIV, HIV positive, HIV status, People living with HIV/AIDS, PLHIV
Download Judgment: Portuguese

Eneh v. Holder

Country: United States
Year: 2010
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citation: 601 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 2010)
Health Topics: Chronic and noncommunicable diseases, Controlled substances, Health systems and financing, HIV/AIDS, Medicines, Prisons
Human Rights: Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
Facts:

The Petitioner, Lawrence Amaechi Eneh, was a native and citizen of Nigeria. He had contracted HIV while working in a nursing home in the United States. He was living with HIV-related illness, Capsis Sarcoma and Valley Fever, a disease of the lungs, at the time of the proceedings. The Petitioner was convicted for the sale …Read more

Tags: Abuse, Access to drugs, Access to health care, Access to medicines, Access to treatment, AIDS, Antiretrovirals, ARVs, Asylum, Budget, Cruel and unusual punishment, Cruel treatment, Custody, Degrading treatment, Health expenditures, Health funding, HIV, HIV positive, Immigration, Imprisonment, Incarceration, Inhuman treatment, Lung disease, Marijuana, Migrants, Noncommunicable diseases, People living with HIV/AIDS, PLHIV, Prison conditions, Torture
Download Judgment: English

H.R. v. Försäkringskassan

Country: Sweden
Year: 2010
Court: Supreme Administrative Court
Citation: RÅ 2010 ref. 52, Målnummer: 1201-09
Health Topics: Health systems and financing
Human Rights: Freedom of movement and residence, Right to health, Right to social security
Facts:

H.R’s partner became acutely ill during her temporary residency in Great Britain. H.R. travelled to Great Britain to support and care for her whilst she was in hospital. He was the only family member present for multiple surgeries to treat his partner’s life-threatening cancer. This required significant and costly travel for H.R. Upon returning to …Read more

Tags: Budget, Health expenditures, Health funding, Health insurance, Health regulation, Health spending, Out-of-pocket expenditures, Reimbursement, Social security
Download Judgment: English Swedish

Ministry of Health v. Atkinson

Country: New Zealand
Year: 2010
Court: High Court
Citation: [2010] NZHC 1216
Health Topics: Disabilities, Health care and health services, Health systems and financing
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination
Facts:

In 2010, the New Zealand Human Rights Tribunal (the Tribunal) declared that the New Zealand government’s policy that excluded relatives of disabled persons from receiving public payments for providing home-care disability services  (the Policy) was discriminatory and thus, violated s 19 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act (NZBoRA). The Tribunal’s declaration was challenged …Read more

Tags: Access to health care, Budget, Disabled, Handicapped, Health care professionals, Health care workers, Health expenditures, Health funding, Health insurance, Health regulation, Health spending, Out-of-pocket expenditures, Physically challenged, Reimbursement, Social security, Subsidies
Download Judgment: English

Case 2009-166f

Country: Belgium
Year: 2009
Court: Constitutional Court [Court Constitutionelle]
Citation: C. C., n°2009-166f, 29 October 2009
Health Topics: Health systems and financing, Medicines
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination
Facts:

The National Institute of Health and Disability Insurance (INAMI) sued the defendant company Aktuapharma for payment of fees. The defendant company was a parallel importer, importing pharmaceutical products from other countries to Belgium. A specific brand-name drug available in Belgium might be available in another country at a cheaper price. The defendant company would import …Read more

Tags: Budget, Health funding, Health insurance, Manufacturing, Pharmaceuticals
Download Judgment: French Flemish

Municipality of Vitória, et al. v. Almeida, et al.

Country: Brazil
Year: 2009
Court: Supremo Tribunal Federal [Federal Supreme Court]
Citation: Municipality of Vitória, et al. v. Almeida, et al.,RE 573061/ES, Supremo Tribunal Federal [Federal Supreme Court] (2009).
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
Facts:

The Municipality of Vitoria, in the State of Espritio Santo, Brazil, and the Federal Government appealed to the Federal Supreme Court of Brazil – an extraordinary appeal – to have the decision of the lower court overruled. The lower court had decided in favor of Alessandro Dias Almeida and others that the State should provide …Read more

Tags: Access to treatment, Budget, Gender reassignment
Download Judgment: Portuguese

Case 1157/2007-II

Country: Mexico
Year: 2008
Court: District Court of the State of Guerrero
Citation: Juzgado del Distrito de Guerrero [JD] [District Court of Guerrero], J.A.IA. 1157/2007-II (Mex.). (Mini Numa Community v. Secretary of Health, et al.)
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, Hospitals, Medicines
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Right to health, Right to life, Right to social security
Facts:

Mini Numa is an indigenous rural community located in the state of Guerrero, Mexico, composed of a population of 270 and whose closest medical center is four kilometers/one hour away in Metlatónoc, Guerrero. The regulations for the construction of a medical center in Guerrero required that the community hold at least 2500 to 3000 inhabitants …Read more

Tags: Access to drugs, Access to health care, Access to medicines, Access to treatment, Budget, Clinical testing, Clinics, Essential medicines, Health facilities, Health funding, Health regulation, Health spending
Download Judgment: Spanish

Case 649

Country: Romania
Year: 2008
Court: National Council for Combating Discrimination
Citation: Decision No. 649 of 4 December 2008
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Health care and health services, Hospitals
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Right to health
Facts:

The petitioner claimed that the defendant hospital’s practice of only admitting mothers with sick children was discriminatory. In particular, the petitioners pointed to the defendant hospital’s notice board which read:  “children up to 3 years of age are admitted along with their mothers”, and “Mother – not relatives”. However, the defendant hospital argued that this …Read more

Tags: Access to health care, Budget, Children, Health facilities, Health spending, Infant health, Minor, Pediatric health, Public hospitals, Social security
Download Judgment: English