100 judgments found.

Case 2000-011f

Country: Belgium
Year: 2000
Court: Court constitutionnelle [Constitutional Court of Belgium]
Citation: C. C., n°2000-011f, 2 February 2000
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination
Tags: Counseling, Diagnostics, Examination, Health regulation, Standard of care
Download Judgment: French

Haindongo Nghidipohamba Nanditume v. Minister of Defense

Country: Namibia
Year: 2000
Court: Labour Court
Citation: Haindongo Nghidipohamba Nanditume v. Minister of Def., Case. No. LC 24/98 (Namib.).
Health Topics: Health care and health services, HIV/AIDS, Infectious diseases
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Right to health
Facts:

The HIV/AIDS epidemic in Namibia prompted the Government of Namibia to issue Guidelines for the Implementation of a National Code on HIV/AIDS in Employment (Guidelines), which extended nondiscrimination provisions to enlistment procedures of the Namibian Defence Force (NDF). In part, the Guidelines aimed to counteract prejudices and ignorance surrounding the nature and cause of HIV/AIDS, …Read more

Tags: Access to health care, Access to treatment, AIDS, Examination, HIV, HIV positive, HIV status, Military, Most-at-risk, People living with HIV/AIDS, PLHIV
Download Judgment: English

Hoffman v. South African Airways

Country: South Africa
Year: 2000
Court: Constitutional Court
Citation: (2) SA 628; 2001 (10) BHRC 571; (2000) 3 CHRLD 146
Health Topics: Health care and health services, HIV/AIDS
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination
Facts:

In 1996, the Appellant applied for employment as a cabin attendant with South African Airways (SAA). At the end of the selection process, he was found to be a suitable candidate for employment. He was then subject to a medical examination, which found him clinically fit and thus suitable for employment. However, a blood test …Read more

Tags: AIDS, Examination, Health care professionals, Health care workers, HIV, HIV positive, HIV status, People living with HIV/AIDS, PLHIV, Testing, Transmission
Download Judgment: English

Kudla v. Poland

Country: Poland
Year: 2000
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: App. No. 30210/96, 35 Eur. H.R. Rep. 198 (2000).
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Mental health, Prisons
Human Rights: Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, Right to bodily integrity, Right to due process/fair trial
Facts:

Applicant, a Polish national suffering from chronic depression, alleged violations of Articles 3 (prohibition of torture), 5.3 (trial within a reasonable time), 6.1 (unreasonably long proceedings), and 13 (effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The applicant was in detention for fraud charges. While in prison, he attempted suicide twice and went …Read more

Tags: Access to health care, Access to treatment, Compulsory commitment, Compulsory confinement, Counseling, Cruel and unusual punishment, Cruel treatment, Custody, Degrading treatment, Depression, Detainee, Detention, Examination, Humiliating treatment, Imprisonment, Incarceration, Inhuman treatment, Inmate, Involuntary confinement, Jail, Mandatory commitment, Mandatory confinement, Mental disability, Mental disorder, Mental illness, Prison conditions, Psychiatry, Psychology, Suicide, Torture

Naxakis v. Western General Hospital

Country: Australia
Year: 1999
Court: High Court
Citation: (1999) 197 CLR 269; (1999) 162 ALR 540; (1999) 73 ALJR 782; (1999) 9 Leg Rep 2; [1999] HCA 22
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Health care and health services, Hospitals, Medical malpractice, Violence
Human Rights: Right to due process/fair trial
Facts:

In July 1980 the appellant, who was 12 years old at the time, was struck on the head by the bag of a schoolmate and collapsed. The appellant was seen by a general practitioner who referred him to Western General Hospital, the first respondent, where he was placed under the care of Mr. Jensen, the …Read more

Tags: Assault, Children, Compensation, Damages, Diagnostics, Examination, Health care professionals, Health care technology, Health care workers, Inadequate treatment, Minor, Misdiagnosis, Negligence, Pediatric health, Standard of care
Download Judgment: English

R (on application of S) v. Louize Collins and Ors.

Country: United Kingdom
Year: 1998
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Citation: [1998] EWCH Admin 490
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Informed consent, Mental health, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity, Right to family life
Facts:

A 36 weeks-pregnant woman, referred to as “MS”, sought care as a new patient at a local National Health Service (NHS) practice on 25th April 1996. She previously had not sought any ante-natal care. She was quickly diagnosed with pre-eclampsia, a condition threatening the life and health of both her and her baby. She rejected …Read more

Tags: Caesarean, Childbirth, Compulsory treatment, Depression, Diagnostics, Eclampsia, Emergency care, Examination, Forced treatment, Incapacity, Informed choice, Involuntary treatment, Mandatory treatment, Maternal health, Mental competence, Non-consensual testing and treatment, Patient choice, Pregnancy, Public hospitals, Unauthorized treatment
Download Judgment: English

The Belgian Professional Association of Urologists, et al. v. The Council of Ministers

Country: Belgium
Year: 1996
Court: Court constitutionnelle [Constitutional Court of Belgium]
Citation: C. C., n°1996-037f, 13 June 1996
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination
Facts:

Article 21 of the law dated December 21, 1994 (“article 21”) changed mandatory insurance payments so as to not grant fees (or, in certain cases, to grant lesser fees) to urologists or other non-radiologists specialists for diagnostic medical imagery services. However, fees remained payable to radiologists for those same services. The Belgian Professional Association of Urologists …Read more

Tags: Diagnostics, Examination, Health care professionals, Health care technology, Health care workers, Health data, Health expenditures, Health insurance, Health regulation, Health spending, Social security
Download Judgment: English French Flemish

CES and Anr. v. Superclinics and Ors.

Country: Australia
Year: 1995
Court: Supreme Court of New South Wales
Citation: (1995) 38 NSWLR 47; (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-360
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Hospitals, Medical malpractice, Mental health, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity
Facts:

CES (‘the first appellant’) sought damages from Superclinics (‘respondent’) for the loss of an opportunity to terminate her pregnancy. The first appellant, a 21-year-old woman, visited a doctor at Superclinics after she missed her period. She stated that if she were found to be pregnant, she would like the pregnancy terminated. The doctor did not …Read more

Tags: Abortion, Abortion counseling, Childbirth, Compensation, Counseling, Criminalization, Damages, Depression, Diagnostics, Duty of care, Examination, Family planning, Health care professionals, Health care workers, Late-term abortion, Maternal health, Misdiagnosis, Negligence, Pregnancy, Remedies, Termination of pregnancy, Testing, Therapeutic abortion, Tort
Download Judgment: English

Diennet v. France

Country: France
Year: 1995
Court: The European Court of Human Rights
Citation: Case number 25/1994/4/472/553
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Hospitals, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to due process/fair trial
Facts:

The Regional Council of Medical Association struck the applicant off the register of practitioners on account of professional misconduct such as not examining the patients personally and not monitoring or adjusting the treatment. On appeal, the National Council modified the Regional Council’s order of striking off to disqualifying him from practicing medicine for three years. …Read more

Tags: Clinics, Duty of care, Examination, Inadequate treatment, Inappropriate treatment, Negligence, Standard of care
Download Judgment: English

McCourt v. Abernathy

Country: United States
Year: 1995
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Citation: McCourt v. Abernathy 457 S.E. 2d 603 (S.C. 1995)
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to health
Facts:

Respondent, Steven McCourt, as representative of his wife, Wendy McCourt, brought wrongful death and survival causes of action against appellant physicians, Glenn Abertnathy and J.D. Clyde and Family Medicine Associates. Decedent Wendy McCourt sought treatment from appellants in December 1987. Dr. Abernathy obtained a history from Wendy revealing a history of liver problems. In March …Read more

Tags: Compensation, Damages, Diagnostics, Duty of care, Emergency care, Examination, Inadequate treatment, Misdiagnosis, Negligence, Primary care, Standard of care, Testing, Tort
Download Judgment: