61 judgments found.

CES and Anr. v. Superclinics and Ors.

Country: Australia
Year: 1995
Court: Supreme Court of New South Wales
Citation: (1995) 38 NSWLR 47; (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-360
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Hospitals, Medical malpractice, Mental health, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity
Facts:

CES (‘the first appellant’) sought damages from Superclinics (‘respondent’) for the loss of an opportunity to terminate her pregnancy. The first appellant, a 21-year-old woman, visited a doctor at Superclinics after she missed her period. She stated that if she were found to be pregnant, she would like the pregnancy terminated. The doctor did not …Read more

Tags: Abortion, Abortion counseling, Childbirth, Compensation, Counseling, Criminalization, Damages, Depression, Diagnostics, Duty of care, Examination, Family planning, Health care professionals, Health care workers, Late-term abortion, Maternal health, Misdiagnosis, Negligence, Pregnancy, Remedies, Termination of pregnancy, Testing, Therapeutic abortion, Tort
Download Judgment: English

Kobe ter Neuzen v. Korn

Country: Canada
Year: 1995
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: [1995] 3 S.C.R. 674, [1995] S.C.J. No. 79
Health Topics: HIV/AIDS, Infectious diseases, Medical malpractice, Sexual and reproductive health
Facts:

The plaintiff was infected with HIV through an artificial insemination (“AI”) procedure performed by the defendant physician in 1985, before the various methods of HIV transmission were widely known. The physician performed 35 AI procedures on the plaintiff between 1981 and January 1985. The physician did not warn the plaintiff about the possibility of HIV …Read more

Tags: Assisted reproductive technology, Compensation, Damages, Duty of care, HIV, HIV positive, In utero fertilization, Negligence, Non-pecuniary damage, People living with HIV/AIDS, PLHIV, Remedies, Sexually transmitted diseases, Sexually transmitted infections, Standard of care, STDs, STIs, Tort, Transmission
Download Judgment: English French

McCourt v. Abernathy

Country: United States
Year: 1995
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Citation: McCourt v. Abernathy 457 S.E. 2d 603 (S.C. 1995)
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to health
Facts:

Respondent, Steven McCourt, as representative of his wife, Wendy McCourt, brought wrongful death and survival causes of action against appellant physicians, Glenn Abertnathy and J.D. Clyde and Family Medicine Associates. Decedent Wendy McCourt sought treatment from appellants in December 1987. Dr. Abernathy obtained a history from Wendy revealing a history of liver problems. In March …Read more

Tags: Compensation, Damages, Diagnostics, Duty of care, Emergency care, Examination, Inadequate treatment, Misdiagnosis, Negligence, Primary care, Standard of care, Testing, Tort
Download Judgment:

Rizzo v. Schiller

Country: United States
Year: 1994
Court: Rizzo v. Schiller 445 S.E. 2d 153 (Va. 1994)
Citation: Rizzo v. Schiller 445 S.E. 2d 153 (Va. 1994)
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Infectious diseases, Medical malpractice, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to health
Facts:

Plaintiffs, Michael Sean Rizzo Sr. and Pamela Rizzo, filed this action against defendant physician Maurice Schiller, who they alleged breached the standard of care owed to them with his negligent and nonconsensual use of obstetrical forceps during Mrs. Rizzo’s delivery. Pamela Rizzo was admitted to Fairfax Hospital on November 7th at 9:00am in active labor. …Read more

Tags: Childbirth, Duty of care, Inappropriate treatment, Infant health, Patient choice, Standard of care, Tort, Unauthorized treatment
Download Judgment:

Rogers v. Whitaker 

Country: Australia
Year: 1992
Court: High Court
Citation: (1992) 175 CLR 479; [1992] HCA 58
Health Topics: Disabilities, Informed consent, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right of access to information, Right to bodily integrity
Facts:

Appellant doctor appealed an award of $808,564.38 to respondent patient. Appellant doctor had operated on the right eye of respondent patient in an attempt to improve its appearance and restore some sight as respondent patient’s right eye had been sightless from a previous injury. The lower court had found that appellant doctor had operated with …Read more

Tags: Blind, Disabled, Duty of care, Handicapped, Informed choice, Negligence, Patient choice, Physically challenged, Standard of care, Tort
Download Judgment: English

Santa Cruz v. Northwest Dade Community Health Center, Inc.

Country: United States
Year: 1991
Court: Third District Court of Appeal, Florida
Citation: 590 S.2d 444 (1991)
Health Topics: Hospitals, Medical malpractice
Facts:

The case discussed the limits of a medical facility’s liability for acts committed by an individual treated on an outpatient (loosely defined, an outpatient is a patient who visits a medical center for diagnosis or treatment, but does not stay overnight at the facility. Per contra, an inpatient is admitted for close monitoring of the …Read more

Tags: Duty of care, Health facilities, Standard of care, Tort
Download Judgment: English

Malette v. Shulman et al.

Country: Canada
Year: 1990
Court: Ontario Supreme Court, Court of Appeal
Citation: 67 DLR (4th) 321, 72 OR (2d) 417
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Informed consent, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Freedom of religion, Right to bodily integrity
Facts:

Malette, a Jehovah’s Witness, sued Dr. Shulman for administering a blood transfusion contrary to her prior expressed wishes. Malette was rushed to the emergency room after sustaining serious injuries in a car accident. She was semi-conscious and bleeding profusely. One of the nurses found a card in her purse, which stated she was a devout …Read more

Tags: Compensation, Compulsory treatment, Damages, Duty of care, Emergency care, Forced treatment, Inappropriate treatment, Involuntary treatment, Non-consensual testing and treatment, Patient choice, Remedies, Standard of care, Tort, Unauthorized treatment
Download Judgment: English

Pt. Parmandand Katara v. Union of India and Ors

Country: India
Year: 1989
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: 1989 AIR 2039; 1989 SCR (3) 997; 1989 SCC (4) 286; JT 1989 (3) 496; 1989 SCALE (2) 380
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Hospitals, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
Facts:

After being knocked down in a motor accident with a speeding car, a scooter driver was taken to the nearest hospital by a good Samaritan. The nearest hospital refused to treat the victim. It directed him to another hospital twenty kilometres away which was apparently better suited to provide treatment in medico-legal cases. The victim …Read more

Tags: Duty of care, Emergency care, Negligence, Tort
Download Judgment: English

Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California

Country: United States
Year: 1963
Court: Supreme Court of California, In Bank
Citation: Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California 383 P.2d 441 (Cal. 1963)
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Hospitals, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to health
Facts:

Hugo Tunkl filed suit to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from the negligence of two physicians at the University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, a non profit charitable institution. Tunkl died after suit was brought, and his wife was substituted as plaintiff. Tunkl was admitted to the UCLA Medical Center …Read more

Tags: Access to health care, Access to treatment, Duty of care, Negligence, Public hospitals, Tort
Download Judgment:

Ricks v. Budge

Country: United States
Year: 1937
Court: Supreme Court of Utah
Citation: Ricks v. Budge 64 P.2d 208 (Utah 1937)
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Medical malpractice, Poverty
Human Rights: Right to health
Facts:

Plaintiff brought action for malpractice against defendant physicians at the “Budge Clinic,” for (1) negligently treating him and discharging him and (2) refusing to treat and abandoning him when he was in immediate need of medical treatment. On March 11, 1935 plaintiff went to Budge Memorial Hospital to seek treatment for an infected hand. Defendant …Read more

Tags: Access to health care, Access to treatment, Damages, Duty of care, Indigent, Low income, Negligence, Tort
Download Judgment: