113 judgments found.

Kumar Mukherjee v. Ruby General Hospital & Ors

Country: India
Year: 2005
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Citation: Original Petition No. 90 of 2002
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Hospitals, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to life
Facts:

A young boy was hit by a bus while riding his motorcycle to school. He suffered a head injury and was brought to the Ruby General Hospital of Kolkata, which was near the accident, by a passerby. When he arrived at the hospital, he was conscious but was bleeding from the nose and mouth. At …Read more

Tags: Damages, Duty of care, Emergency care, Inadequate treatment, Negligence, Standard of care, Tort
Download Judgment: English

N.V. v. LLC “… Hospital”

Country: Georgia
Year: 2005
Court: Supreme Court [საქართველოს უზენაესი სასამართლო]
Citation: Docket number #ას-33-406-05
Health Topics: Aging, Disabilities, Hospitals, Informed consent, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to health
Facts:

N.V. submitted a lawsuit in Court against the respondent LLC “… Hospital” for reimbursement of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages after multiple failed surgeries. The plaintiff alleged the resulting damages were caused by poorly done surgeries and post-surgical treatment. The plaintiff was operated on for left pelvis-hip joint total endoprosthesis. The plaintiff had three surgical operations …Read more

Tags: Aged persons, Compensation, Damages, Disabled, Duty of care, Handicapped, Inadequate treatment, Negligence, Older persons, Physically challenged, Public hospitals, Remedies, Standard of care
Download Judgment: English Georgian

Pehle v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance

Country: United States
Year: 2005
Court: 10th Circuit Court of Appeal
Citation: 397 F.3d 897 (2005)
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health information, HIV/AIDS, Infectious diseases, Medical malpractice
Facts:

Gary and Renna Pehle (“Appellants”), husband and wife, applied for life insurance with the Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company (“Farm Bureau”) in Wyoming in 1999. As part of the application process, the Pehle’s submitted a blood test. The test was contracted to LabOne, an independent company located in Kansas. Both Appellants tested positive for Human …Read more

Tags: AIDS, Duty of care, Health records, HIV, HIV positive, HIV status, Medical records, Negligence, Sexually transmitted diseases, Testing
Download Judgment: English

Roche v. United Kingdom

Country: United Kingdom
Year: 2005
Court:
Citation: Roche v. U.K., App. No. 32555/96, 42 Eur. H.R. Rep. 30 (2006).
Health Topics: Chronic and noncommunicable diseases, Health care and health services, Health information, Occupational health
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, Freedom of expression, Right of access to information, Right to due process/fair trial, Right to health, Right to privacy, Right to property
Facts:

Applicant, a United Kingdom national who had served in the British Army, maintains that his health problems, which left him handicapped, were the result of his participation in mustard and nerve gas tests conducted while he served in the British Armed Forces at the Chemical and Biological Defense Establishment (CBDE) at Porton Down Barracks (England) …Read more

Tags: Asthma, Awareness, Contamination, Cruel treatment, Degrading treatment, Duty of care, Inhuman treatment, Negligence, Notification, Pollution, Respiratory diseases, Tort, Torture, Toxic waste
Download Judgment: English French

AB and Ors. v. Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust

Country: United Kingdom
Year: 2004
Court: High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
Citation: [2004] EWHC 644 (QB), [2005] Lloyds Rep Med 1, [2004] 2 FLR 365, [2005] 2 WLR 358, [2004] Fam Law 501, [2005] QB 506, [2004] 3 FCR 324, [2005] Lloyd's Rep Med 1, (2004) 77 BMLR 145
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health information, Hospitals, Informed consent, Medical malpractice, Mental health, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right of access to information, Right to bodily integrity, Right to family life
Facts:

In 1999, it was disclosed that for many years tissue and organs had been taken at or after post-mortems on deceased children, which were retained without the knowledge of the parents. Hospital post-mortem examinations were generally carried out following the death of a person in a hospital, provided, in accordance with the Human Tissue Act …Read more

Tags: Awareness, Childbirth, Depression, Diagnostics, Disclosure, Duty of care, Examination, Family planning, Health care professionals, Health care workers, Health facilities, Informed choice, Mental disorder, Miscarriage, Negligence, Non-disclosure, Notification, Parental consent, Patient choice, Pregnancy, Public hospitals, Testing, Tort, Trauma
Download Judgment: English

Chester v. Afshar

Country: United Kingdom
Year: 2004
Court: House of Lords
Citation: [2004] UKHL 41
Health Topics: Health information, Informed consent, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity
Facts:

Carole Ogilvy Chester made a claim of medical negligence against her surgeon Fari Afshar and sought damages. Ms. Chester suffered from severe backaches for a considerable amount of time, and was referred to Dr. Afshar who was a renowned consultant neurosurgeon. Dr. Afshar advised her to go in for surgery, which she did. The surgery …Read more

Tags: Awareness, Duty of care, Informed choice, Negligence, Notification, Tort
Download Judgment: English

Harvey v. PD 

Country: Australia
Year: 2004
Court: Supreme Court of New South Wales
Citation: 59 NSWLR 639;[2004] NSWCA 97 
Health Topics: Health information, HIV/AIDS, Infectious diseases, Informed consent, Medical malpractice, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Right to bodily integrity
Facts:

The Respondent, PD, was a patient of the Alpha Medical Centre (the Centre) from October 1997 until February 1999. On 16 November 1998, she participated in a joint medical consultation with her husband-to-be, FH. The Appellants, Dr. Harvey and Dr. Chen, were their treating physicians. The couple met with Dr. Harvey for the purpose of …Read more

Tags: AIDS, Compensation, Confidentiality, Damages, Disclosure, Duty of care, Health information, Hepatitis, HIV, HIV positive, HIV status, Informed choice, Negligence, Non-disclosure, Patient choice, People living with HIV/AIDS, PLHIV, Remedies, Secrecy, Sexually transmitted diseases, Sexually transmitted infections, Standard of care, STDs, STIs, Tort, Transmission
Download Judgment: English

Case 22/2003 (IV.28)

Country: Hungary
Year: 2003
Court: Constitutional Court
Health Topics: Health information, Informed consent, Medical malpractice
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Right to bodily integrity, Right to life
Facts:

The Court of Hungary received several petitions regarding the right of patients suffering from terminal illnesses to end their lives with dignity and consolidated the petitions into a single judgment. One petition asked the Court to declare unconstitutional and annul the last sentence in Section 43, paragraph (2) of Act II of 1972 on Healthcare. …Read more

Tags: Awareness, Disclosure, Duty of care, Forced treatment, Health care professionals, Health care workers, Informed choice, Involuntary treatment, Non-consensual testing and treatment, Palliative care, Patient choice, Unauthorized treatment
Download Judgment: English

Cattanach v. Melchior

Country: Australia
Year: 2003
Court: High Court
Citation: (2003) 215 CLR 1; (2003) 199 ALR 131; (2003) 77 ALJR 1312; [2003] HCA 38
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Medical malpractice, Sexual and reproductive health
Facts:

The respondents (plaintiffs at first instance), a married couple, decided not to have any more children. Mrs. M elected to have sterilization surgery (tubal litigation) performed by the appellant (defendant). Mrs. M told the appellant that her right fallopian tube had been removed and on examination that appeared to be correct, so appellant only performed …Read more

Tags: Child development, Childbirth, Children, Compensation, Damages, Duty of care, Family planning, Health care professionals, Negligence, Pregnancy, Sterilization, Tort
Download Judgment: English

Rees v. Darlington Memorial NHS Trust

Country: United Kingdom
Year: 2003
Court: House of Lords
Citation: [2003] UKHL 52
Health Topics: Disabilities, Medical malpractice, Sexual and reproductive health
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Right to family life
Facts:

After conceiving as a result of a failed sterilization surgery, Karina Rees filed a claim of negligence against the Darlington Memorial NHS Trust (the Trust) to recover the costs of rearing her child. Mrs. Rees suffered from a genetic condition that had left her almost completely blind. She believed that her disability meant that raising …Read more

Tags: Disabled, Duty of care, Family planning, Handicapped, Inadequate treatment, Inappropriate treatment, Negligence, Physically challenged, Sterilization, Tort
Download Judgment: English