82 judgments found.

Meenakshi Pharma Distributors v. State of Karnataka and Others

Country: India
Year: 1998
Court: High Court - Karnataka
Citation: 1999 (2) KarLJ 164
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, Medicines, Poverty
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
Facts:

The Appellant, Meenakshi Pharma Distributors, had conducted various transactions with the authorities of the State of Karnataka for the sale of drugs. The contract stipulated that “if the payment is delayed beyond the period of 30 days, interest shall be payable at the rate of 15 per cent.” However, the trial court reduced the rate …Read more

Tags: Access to drugs, Access to medicines, Access to treatment, Budget, Essential medicines, Health expenditures, Health funding, Health spending, Indigent, Pharmaceuticals, Poor, Subsidies, Underprivileged
Download Judgment: English

Policlínica Privada de Medicina y Cirugía S.A. v. Municipalidad de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires

Country: Argentina
Year: 1998
Court: Supreme Court of Justice [Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Argentina]
Citation: P. 169.XXXIII
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, Hospitals
Human Rights: Right to housing, Right to social security
Facts:

Policlínica Privada de Medicina y Cirugía S.A. (Policlínica) brought aguarantee of protection of individual constitutional rights (amparo protection) against the resolution of the Health Secretary of the then Municipality of the City of Buenos Aires. Policlínica had sought to transfer a minor, who was receiving intensive care treatment in the Petitioner’s premises, to a public hospital. The minor …Read more

Tags: Access to health care, Access to treatment, Children, Clinics, Emergency care, Health funding, Health insurance, Minor, Out-of-pocket expenditures, Pediatric health, Private hospitals, Public hospitals, Reimbursement, Social security, Subsidies
Download Judgment: English Spanish

T.V.S. Suzuki Employees’ Union v. Regional Director, ESI

Country: India
Year: 1998
Court: High Court - Madras
Citation: (1999) IILLJ 766 Mad
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing
Human Rights: Right to health, Right to life
Facts:

The Central Government amended Rule 50 of the Employees’ State Insurance (Central) Rules, 1950 (the Rule) and increased the wage limit for insurance coverage of employees from Rs. 3,000 to Rs. 6,500. A writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution (original writ jurisdiction of High Courts) challenging the amendment on the ground …Read more

Tags: Access to treatment, Health expenditures, Health funding, Health insurance, Subsidies
Download Judgment: English

Andersson, Anne-Marie v. Sweden

Country: Sweden
Year: 1997
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Citation: App. No. 20022/92, 25 Eur. H.R. Rep. 722 (1998).
Health Topics: Child and adolescent health, Health care and health services, Health information, Health systems and financing, Mental health
Human Rights: Right to due process/fair trial, Right to privacy
Facts:

Applicant, a Swedish national who lived with her youngest son was unable to work as a result of dental problems which caused her severe pain, and anxiety about a dispute with her landlord. She contacted a psychiatric clinic in order to receive a medical certificate which would enable her to claim sickness benefit from the …Read more

Tags: Confidentiality, Counseling, Disclosure, Health data, Health records, Health regulation, Medical records, Mental competence, Mental disability, Mental disorder, Mental illness, Non-disclosure, Notification, Psychiatry, Psychology, Secrecy, Social security, Subsidies
Download Judgment: English French

Case 1997-020

Country: Belgium
Year: 1997
Court: Court constitutionnelle [Constitutional Court of Belgium]
Citation: C. C., n°19967-020f, 15 April 1997
Health Topics: Health systems and financing
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination
Facts:

The professional Union of Belgian and International Insurance Companies (“UPEA”) introduced a request to annul articles 24, 4, and 25 (the “impugned provisions”) of the law dated December 20, 1995 (the “contested law”), which pertained to mandatory healthcare and indemnity insurance. UPEA asserted that article 24, 4, of the contested law conferred to certain physician …Read more

Tags: Health care professionals, Health care workers, Health expenditures, Health funding, Health insurance, Health regulation, Health spending, Social security, Subsidies
Download Judgment: English French Flemish

Case SU-480/97

Country: Colombia
Year: 1997
Court: Constitutional Court
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, HIV/AIDS, Informed consent, Medicines
Human Rights: Freedom of association, Right to health, Right to life, Right to social security
Facts:

The case combined six writs of tutela that were filed against the Institute of Social Security (ISS) into one record. The Plaintiffs were persons living with HIV who had not been able to obtain protease inhibitors to treat their HIV. The protease inhibitors sought by the Plaintiffs were antiretrovirals used in the treatment of HIV …Read more

Tags: Access to drugs, Access to health care, Access to medicines, Access to treatment, AIDS, Antiretrovirals, ARVs, Budget, Generic drugs, Health care professionals, Health care workers, Health expenditures, Health funding, Health insurance, HIV, Informed choice, Out-of-pocket expenditures, Patient choice, People living with HIV/AIDS, PLHIV, Reimbursement, Social security, Subsidies
Download Judgment: English Spanish

Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General)

Country: Canada
Year: 1997
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624
Health Topics: Disabilities, Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, Hospitals
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination
Facts:

Robin Eldridge, John Warren, and Linda Warren were each born deaf. They alleged that the provincial government of British Columbia’s failure to provide funding for sign language interpreters for deaf persons when they received medical services violated the right to equality contained in s. 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.   Medical …Read more

Tags: Access to treatment, Budget, Clinics, Deaf, Disabled, Health funding, Health insurance, Out-of-pocket expenditures, Public hospitals, Reimbursement, Social security, Subsidies
Download Judgment: English French

R v. Gloucestershire County Council and Anr., ex parte Barry

Country: United Kingdom
Year: 1997
Court: House of Lords
Citation: [1997] 2 All ER 1 (HL); [1997] 2 W.L.R. 459; [1997] A.C. 584
Health Topics: Disabilities, Health systems and financing
Human Rights: Right to health
Facts:

Michael Barry was an 81-year-old man who suffered from a number of disabilities and lived alone within the Gloucestershire County Council (the Council). Barry was originally assessed as requiring a number of home care services, but after budgetary cuts the Council informed Barry that they would no longer be able to perform cleaning and laundry …Read more

Tags: Budget, Disabled, Handicapped, Health expenditures, Health facilities, Health funding, Health insurance, Health spending, Out-of-pocket expenditures, Subsidies
Download Judgment: English

Case 1316B/1995

Country: Hungary
Year: 1996
Court: Constitutional Court
Health Topics: Health care and health services, Health systems and financing, Hospitals
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Right to health
Facts:

A petition was filed challenging the constitutionality of Section 24 Paragraph 4 of Government Decree 103/1995 (VIII. 25.) on Certain Issues of Social Security Funding of Health Care and its Annex No. 6. It was argued that as a result of these provisions, equal in patient care as a constitutional right, was violated. Financing was …Read more

Tags: Access to health care, Budget, Health expenditures, Health facilities, Health funding, Health insurance, Health spending, Public hospitals, Secondary care, Subsidies
Download Judgment: English

Case 56/1995 (IX.15.) AB

Country: Hungary
Year: 1995
Court: Constitutional Court
Health Topics: Health systems and financing
Human Rights: Freedom from discrimination, Right to health, Right to property
Facts:

Petitioners challenged several amendments to statutes regulating employee benefit entitlements, which were inexorably connected to their social security entitlements under Hungary’s “mixed system” of social security (insurance and solidarity). The challenged amendments (1) provided that an employee was entitled to 25 sick days per year, for 5 of which she was not entitled to remuneration, …Read more

Tags: Employment, Health expenditures, Health funding, Health insurance, Health spending, Out-of-pocket expenditures, Social security, Subsidies
Download Judgment: English